top of page

SEARCH RESULTS

7 items found for ""

  • Intersections of Justice: A Historical Overview of Racial and LGBTQIA+ Activism in the Pursuit of Equal Rights

    It is not our differences that divide us. It is our inability to recognize, accept, and celebrate those differences. — Audre Lorde Stonewall Riots The fight for LGBTQIA+ rights stands as a testament to the resilience and courage of a community that has battled discrimination, prejudice, and systemic oppression for decades. From the shadows of marginalization to the forefront of global discourse, the LGBTQIA+ rights movement has long been intertwined with the intersecting identities of race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, and gender identity. From the civil rights movements of the 20th century to contemporary LGBTQIA+ advocacy, activists have recognized the interconnected nature of oppression and mobilized across diverse communities to effect change. In this blog, we will briefly discuss the history of the intersection of racial and LGBTQIA+ activism, exploring pivotal moments, challenges, and the imperative for robust consensus in the fight for full equal rights. The Roots of Intersectionality: The roots of intersectional activism can be traced back to the early 20th century when marginalized communities began to recognize the common threads of discrimination that bound them together. Figures like Bayard Rustin , a key organizer of the civil rights movement and an openly gay man, exemplified the interconnectedness of racial and LGBTQIA+ identities. However, it wasn't until the late 20th century that intersectionality emerged as a central tenet of social justice movements. Civil Rights and LGBTQIA+ Liberation: The civil rights movement of the 1950s and 1960s laid the groundwork for contemporary activism by challenging institutionalized racism and segregation. Figures like Audre Lorde and James Baldwin , who identified both as Black and LGBTQIA+ , brought attention to the intersections of race, sexuality, and gender in their writings and activism. Despite facing marginalization within their own communities, they advocated for solidarity and coalition-building across diverse movements. Stonewall and Beyond: The origins of LGBTQIA+ activism can be traced back to the mid-20th century when individuals began to challenge societal norms and fight against the criminalization and pathologization of non-heteronormative identities. The Stonewall riots in 1969 are often considered a watershed moment, the uprising against police brutality sparked a wave of community mobilization and activism and paved the way for greater visibility and advocacy. This event, coupled with the pioneering work of Black and Latinx transgender women and gender-nonconforming activists like Marsha P. Johnson , Sylvia Rivera , and Stormé DeLarverie , laid the foundation for the organized struggle for LGBTQIA+ rights. However, the mainstream narrative often overlooks the contributions of people of color to the LGBTQIA+ movement, highlighting the need for a more inclusive and intersectional approach. HIV/AIDS Epidemic: The HIV/AIDS epidemic of the 1980s and 1990s disproportionately affected communities of color and LGBTQIA+ individuals, exposing systemic inequalities in healthcare and social support systems. Organizations like the AIDS Coalition to Unleash Power (ACT UP) mobilized grassroots activism to demand access to treatment, research funding, and an end to stigmatization. The crisis underscored the urgency of addressing intersecting forms of discrimination and galvanized a generation of activists. In the following decades, LGBTQIA+ movements gained momentum globally, with activists advocating for decriminalization, anti-discrimination laws, and recognition of same-sex relationships. The fight for visibility and acceptance became intertwined with broader social justice movements, fostering solidarity among marginalized communities. Legal Strides and Setbacks: The LGBTQIA+ rights movement achieved significant legal victories over time, with milestones such as the decriminalization of homosexuality with the overturning of Lawrence v. Texas , the repeal of " Don't Ask, Don't Tell " in the United States military, and the legalization of same-sex marriage in several countries. However, progress has been uneven, with setbacks and ongoing challenges, such as the criminalization of homosexuality in some regions and the persistence of discriminatory practices. Challenges and Triumphs: Despite significant strides in the realms of civil rights and LGBTQIA+ liberation, challenges persist for individuals at the intersections of race, ethnicity, and sexual orientation or gender identity. Transgender people of color, for example, face alarmingly high rates of violence, homelessness, and unemployment. Moreover, the political landscape remains fraught with attempts to roll back hard-won protections and rights, underscoring the ongoing need for vigilant advocacy and resistance. The Imperative for Robust Consensus: Achieving full equal rights for individuals at the intersections of race and LGBTQIA+ identities requires a robust consensus that transcends narrow definitions of identity and solidarity. Several factors contribute to the imperative for consensus: 1. Intersectional Advocacy: Recognizing the unique experiences and challenges faced by individuals at the intersections of multiple identities is essential for effective advocacy. Intersectional approaches to activism prioritize the voices and needs of marginalized communities, fostering solidarity and collaboration. 2. Policy Reform: Legislative and policy changes are instrumental in advancing equal rights and protections for all individuals. Robust consensus-building is necessary to advocate for comprehensive anti-discrimination laws, healthcare access, and social services that address the intersecting needs of marginalized communities. 3. Education and Awareness: Challenging stereotypes, combating prejudice, and promoting understanding are crucial components of intersectional activism. Education and awareness campaigns play a vital role in building empathy, fostering dialogue, and dismantling systems of oppression. 4. Community Engagement: Grassroots organizing and community-building efforts are essential for amplifying marginalized voices and effecting change at the local level. Robust consensus-building within communities fosters solidarity, resilience, and collective action. From the civil rights era to contemporary advocacy, activists have recognized the interconnectedness of oppression and mobilized across diverse communities to effect change. As we navigate the complexities of the modern world, the imperative for robust consensus-building has never been greater. By centering intersectional approaches, amplifying marginalized voices, and fostering solidarity, we can work towards a future where all individuals, regardless of race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, or gender identity, can live free from discrimination and enjoy the full spectrum of human rights. The journey continues, fueled by the unwavering commitment of activists and allies alike. References Brown, A. (2011). How queer ‘pack rats’ and activist archivists saved our history: an overview of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) archives, 1970–2008. Serving LGBTIQ library and archives users: Essays on outreach, service, collections and access , 121-35. Klepacki, G. (2021). Queer: A 25 Year History, A Blooming Identity. Kunzel, R. (2018). The power of queer history. The American Historical Review , 123 (5), 1560-1582. Quesada, U., Gomez, L., & Vidal-Ortiz, S. (Eds.). (2015). Queer brown voices: personal narratives of Latina/o LGBT activism . University of Texas Press. Teachrock. (n.d.). Stonewall Riots [Video]. Teachrock. https://teachrock.org/lesson/yall-better-quiet-down-black-and-latinx-lgbtq-pioneers/

  • Safeguarding Vital LGBTQIA+ Organizations: Mitigating Financial Vulnerabilities During Election Years

    When I liberate myself, I liberate others. If you don’t speak out ain’t nobody going to speak out for you. — Fannie Lou Hamer VOTING IN TEXAS:  Everything You Need to Know - VoteTexas.gov VOTING IN YOUR STATE:  Everything You Need to Know - Vote.gov Election years often witness a surge in political fundraising, with campaigns and causes vying for attention and resources. While this can be a boon for some organizations, it can pose significant challenges for others, particularly those serving marginalized communities like the LGBTQIA+ community. For the LGBTQIA+ community, election years serve as crucial junctures where voices amplify, issues crystallize, and paths toward equality are charted. Central to this momentum are fundraising initiatives, community outreach efforts, and voting campaigns which serve as the lifeblood of advocacy and awareness. Vital organizations and charities that provide essential support, advocacy, and services to LGBTQIA+ individuals may face financial setbacks amidst the competitive fundraising landscape of election years. It's imperative to weigh salience and implement strategies to ensure sustainability and resilience during such periods. Fundraising as a Catalyst for Change:   1. Financial Empowerment:  Fundraising arms advocacy groups and organizations with the financial resources necessary to amplify LGBTQIA+ voices, support candidates who champion equality, and counter opposition efforts. 2. Visibility and Influence:  Financial contributions enable LGBTQIA+ advocacy groups to engage in media campaigns, sponsor events, and mobilize supporters, thereby amplifying their visibility and influence within the political landscape. 3. Supporting LGBTQIA Candidates:  Fundraising efforts during election years are instrumental in supporting LGBTQIA+ candidates, providing them with the resources needed to mount effective campaigns and challenge traditional power structures. Community Outreach: Bridging Hearts and Minds:   1. Education and Awareness:  Community outreach initiatives foster understanding and empathy, educating the public about LGBTQIA+ issues, dispelling myths, and combating prejudice. 2. Building Coalitions:  Outreach programs forge alliances with diverse communities, amplifying the collective voice for equality and championing solidarity in the pursuit of shared goals. 3. Empowering Grassroots Activism:  By engaging directly with communities, outreach efforts empower grassroots activists, mobilizing them to effect change at the local, state, and national levels. Voting: The Power of Civic Engagement:   1. Political Representation:  Voting enables the LGBTQIA+ community to elect representatives who prioritize LGBTQIA+ rights, advocate for inclusive policies, and champion equality in legislative bodies. 2. Policy Impact:  By exercising their right to vote, LGBTQIA+ individuals and allies influence policy decisions at local, state, and national levels, shaping the legal landscape and advancing LGBTQIA+ rights. 3. Accountability:  Voting holds elected officials accountable for their actions, sending a clear message that support for LGBTQIA+ issues is not only valued but also expected by constituents Understanding the Impact of Election Year Fundraising: The LGBTQIA+ community relies heavily on a network of organizations and charities that offer critical services ranging from healthcare and mental health support to advocacy and legal assistance. These organizations often operate on tight budgets and rely on a mix of grants, donations, and fundraising efforts to sustain their operations. However, during election years, the influx of political fundraising can divert attention and resources away from these vital organizations, potentially jeopardizing their ability to meet the needs of the community. Challenges Faced: 1. Donor Fatigue:  With numerous political campaigns and causes soliciting donations, there's a risk of donor fatigue, where individuals may prioritize political contributions over charitable giving. 2. Competing Priorities:  Political campaigns often dominate media attention and public discourse during election seasons, making it challenging for LGBTQIA+ organizations to garner support and visibility for their causes. 3. Uncertainty and Volatility:  Political climates can be unpredictable, leading to economic uncertainty that may deter donors from making charitable contributions. Strategies for Mitigation: 1. Diversification of Funding Sources:  Encouraging LGBTQIA+ organizations to diversify their funding sources can help mitigate the impact of fluctuations in charitable giving during election years. This includes seeking out grants, corporate sponsorships, and partnerships to supplement traditional individual donations. 2. Long-Term Donor Engagement:  Cultivating strong relationships with donors throughout the year, rather than solely during fundraising campaigns, can nurture loyalty and commitment to the organization's mission, reducing the risk of donor diversion during election cycles. 3. Strategic Messaging and Advocacy:  LGBTQIA+ organizations can leverage election cycles as opportunities to raise awareness about their work and advocate for their causes. By aligning their messaging with current political debates and issues, they can amplify their impact and attract support from both existing and new donors. 4. Collaboration and Coalition-Building:  Collaborating with other organizations and forming coalitions can amplify the collective voice of the LGBTQIA+ community, making it more difficult for their issues to be sidelined during election seasons. Pooling resources and coordinating fundraising efforts can also increase efficiency and effectiveness. Case Studies:   1. Stonewall Democrats:  This organization engages in fundraising, community outreach, and voter mobilization efforts to support LGBTQIA+-friendly candidates and advance LGBTQIA+ rights within the Democratic Party. 2. GLAAD:  Through its media advocacy work, GLAAD raises awareness of LGBTQIA+ issues, educates the public, and mobilizes support for LGBTQIA+ rights, highlighting the importance of outreach beyond traditional political channels 3. The Human Rights Campaign (HRC):  Through its fundraising prowess, the HRC has played a pivotal role in advancing LGBTQIA+ rights, supporting pro-equality candidates, and mobilizing communities during election cycles. 4. Pride Fund to End Gun Violence:  Founded in the aftermath of the Pulse nightclub shooting, this organization channels fundraising efforts toward supporting LGBTQIA-inclusive gun safety measures and advocating for political candidates committed to ending gun violence. Conclusion: Fundraising, community outreach, and voting stand as pillars, galvanizing support, raising awareness, and mobilizing change-makers. Ensuring the financial stability and sustainability of vital LGBTQIA+ organizations and charities during election years requires proactive measures and strategic planning. By diversifying funding sources, engaging donors year-round, strategically messaging their advocacy efforts, and fostering collaboration within the community, these organizations can mitigate the impact of political fundraising fluctuations and continue to provide essential support and services to LGBTQIA+ individuals. Safeguarding vital LGBTQIA+ organizations, especially during times of heightened political activity, is a high priority. As we navigate the complexities of democracy, let us recognize the transformative power of collective action, leveraging our resources and voices to build a more inclusive and equitable future for all. Together, we can safeguard the progress made and advance the rights and well-being of the LGBTQIA+ community. References Fundraising Authority, "The Power of Nonprofit Collaboration," https://www.thefundraisingauthority.com/strategy-and-planning/the-power-of-nonprofit-collaboration/ GLAAD. “Our Work.” Retrieved from https://www.glaad.org/our-work Human Rights Campaign. "About Us." Retrieved from [ https://www.hrc.org/about-us](https://www.hrc.org/about-us)   National Council of Nonprofits, "Diversifying Funding Streams," https://www.councilofnonprofits.org/tools-resources/diversifying-funding-streams Nonprofit Tech for Good, "Donor Engagement Strategies for Nonprofits," https://www.nptechforgood.com/2019/09/26/6-donor-engagement-strategies-for-nonprofits/ Pride Fund to End Gun Violence. "Our Mission." Retrieved from [ https://www.pridefund.org/our-mission/](https://www.pridefund.org/our-mission/) Stanford Social Innovation Review, "Crafting Messages to Persuade Donors," https://ssir.org/articles/entry/crafting_messages_to_persuade_donors Stonewall Democrats. “About Us.” Retrieved from https://stonewalldemocrats.org/about

  • Navigating the Landscape of Anti-Gay Christian Movements and LGBTQIA+-Accepting Religions: Understanding Dynamics, Challenges, and Paths Forward

    By doing the work to love ourselves more, I believe we will love each other bette r. – Laverne Cox In contemporary discourse surrounding LGBTQIA+ rights and religious beliefs, there exists a complex interplay between movements that advocate against homosexuality from a Christian perspective, such as "Reclaim the Rainbow," and religions that affirm and accept LGBTQIA+ individuals. This blog discusses the intersection of these two phenomena, exploring their dynamics, challenges, and potential paths forward. Anti-Gay Christian Movements: The "Reclaim the Rainbow" movement exemplifies one facet of anti-gay Christian activism. Originating from the belief that the rainbow, a symbol of God's covenant in Christianity, has been co-opted by the LGBTQIA+ community to normalize homosexuality, this movement seeks to reclaim the symbol's original meaning (Smith, 2022). It reflects a broader sentiment within certain Christian denominations that view homosexuality as sinful and incompatible with biblical teachings (Brownson, 2013). At the core of anti-gay Christian movements are theological interpretations that condemn same-sex relationships and gender nonconformity. These interpretations often stem from select passages in the Bible, such as Leviticus 18:22 and Romans 1:26-27, which are interpreted as condemning homosexual acts (Gagnon, 2002). Such beliefs fuel advocacy efforts against LGBTQIA+ rights, including opposition to same-sex marriage, adoption by same-sex couples, and anti-discrimination laws. LGBTQIA+ Accepting and Affirming Religions: Contrary to anti-gay Christian movements, several religions embrace LGBTQIA+ individuals and affirm their identities. Unitarian Universalism stands out as a welcoming faith tradition that celebrates diversity and inclusivity. Unitarian Universalist congregations prioritize acceptance and affirmation of LGBTQIA+ individuals, advocating for their rights within and beyond religious contexts (Tompkins & Woodbury, 2020). Reform Judaism similarly embraces LGBTQIA+ inclusion, reflecting its commitment to social justice and equality. Reform Jewish communities endorse same-sex marriages and welcome LGBTQIA+ clergy members, exemplifying their dedication to affirming diverse identities within the faith (Singer, 2019). Buddhism, known for its principles of compassion and acceptance, also has traditions that affirm LGBTQIA+ identities. While interpretations of Buddhist teachings vary, many Buddhist communities prioritize love and acceptance, creating spaces where LGBTQIA+ individuals can explore their spirituality free from judgment (Billard & Gross, 2020). Intersection and Challenges: The intersection of anti-gay Christian movements and LGBTQIA+-accepting religions presents various challenges. It highlights the diversity of religious beliefs and interpretations within Christianity and other faith traditions, illustrating tensions between conservative and progressive perspectives on LGBTQIA+ issues. Furthermore, this intersection underscores broader debates about the role of religion in shaping societal attitudes toward sexual orientation and gender identity. It raises questions about the boundaries between religious freedom and LGBTQIA+ rights, particularly regarding anti-discrimination laws and religious exemptions (Berg, 2017). Moreover, the intersection underscores the experiences of LGBTQIA+ individuals navigating faith communities that may reject or affirm their identities. It illuminates the psychological and emotional toll of reconciling religious beliefs with sexual orientation or gender identity, as well as the importance of finding supportive communities and spiritual practices that embrace diversity (Yip, 2018). Paths Forward: Despite the challenges posed by the intersection of anti-gay Christian movements and LGBTQIA+-accepting religions, there are paths forward toward greater understanding and reconciliation. Dialogue and engagement between individuals and communities representing diverse perspectives are essential for fostering empathy and mutual respect. Education and advocacy efforts can also play a crucial role in promoting LGBTQIA+ inclusion within religious contexts. By challenging stereotypes and misconceptions about sexual orientation and gender identity, and highlighting the theological grounds for LGBTQIA+ acceptance within certain faith traditions, it is possible to cultivate more inclusive religious communities (Lammert, 2020). Furthermore, legal and policy interventions that protect LGBTQIA+ rights while respecting religious freedom are vital for creating environments where individuals can practice their faith without fear of discrimination or persecution (Beaman, 2021). Balancing these competing interests requires careful consideration of the needs and rights of all individuals involved. In conclusion, the intersection of anti-gay Christian movements and LGBTQIA+-accepting religions illuminates complex dynamics within religious communities and broader societal debates about LGBTQIA+ rights. While tensions and challenges persist, there are opportunities for dialogue, education, and advocacy to foster greater understanding and acceptance. By embracing diversity and affirming the inherent worth and dignity of all individuals, regardless of sexual orientation or gender identity, we can move towards a more inclusive and equitable society. References Beaman, L. G., & Steele, C. (2021). Living Well Together: Nonreligion in the Context of Religious Diversity. Secular Studies , 3 (1), 49-70. Berg, F. T. (2017). Hurting in the Church: A way forward for wounded Catholics . Our Sunday Visitor. Billard, T. J., & Gross, L. (2020). LGBTQ politics in media and culture. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics . Brownson, J. V. (2013). Bible, gender, sexuality: Reframing the church's debate on same-sex relationships . Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing. Gagnon, R. A. (2002). The Bible and homosexual practice: Texts and hermeneutics. Pro Ecclesia , 11 (3), 377-379. Lammert, C. (2020). Amplifying Diverse Voices with Read-Aloud in Elementary, Middle, and High School Classrooms. In Amplifying Diverse Voices with Read-Aloud in Elementary, Middle, and High School Classrooms . Developing Conceptual Knowledge Through Oral and Written Language. Singer, J. W. (2019). Public Accommodations & Human Flourishing: Sexual Orientation & Religious Liberty. Cornell JL & Pub. Pol'y , 29 , 697. Smith, D. B. (2022). Calling the Question: The Role of Ministries of Presence and Polity Principles in the Struggle for LGBTQIA+ Inclusion, Ordination, and Marriage in the Presbyterian Church (USA) and Its Predecessor Denominations. Religions , 13 (11), 1119. Tompkins, C., & Woodbury, S. (2020, December 10). Welcoming and inclusive congregations: Affirming LGBTQ individuals and families . UUA.org . https://www.uua.org/lgbtq/welcoming Yip, A. K. T. (2018). Research on sexuality and religion: Some reflections on accomplishments and future directions. Sexualities , 21 (8), 1291-1294.

  • Reimagining Resilience: Intersectionality and the Evolution of the Final Girl in Contemporary Horror Cinema

    "Women need to see themselves fighting monsters. That’s part of how we figure out our stories. But we also need to see ourselves behind-the-scenes, creating and writing and directing. We need to tell our stories, too.” ― Mallory O'Meara, The Lady from the Black Lagoon: Hollywood Monsters and the Lost Legacy of Milicent Patrick SEE ALSO: Top Black Final Girls in Horror | Real Queen of Horror  (Video) Why We Need More Black Final Girls in Horror: A Call For Change  (Article)   Horror movies have long captivated audiences with suspenseful narratives and layered themes, with the "Final Girl" trope standing out as a central phenomenon. Coined by Carol J. Clover in Men, Women, and Chain Saws: Gender in the Modern Horror Film , the "Final Girl" represents the last female survivor in horror, confronting the antagonist and emerging victorious (Clover, 1992). Historically, the Final Girl has symbolized female empowerment; however, the lack of intersectional representation within horror limits the visibility of diverse resilience and survival experiences, particularly among BIPOC (Black, Indigenous, and People of Color) audiences (Coleman, 2011). Origins of the Final Girl in Horror Movies The Final Girl archetype, popularized in classic horror films of the 1970s and 1980s such as Halloween  (1978) and A Nightmare on Elm Street  (1984), embodies traits like virtue, resourcefulness, and resilience (Clover, 1992). These early portrayals primarily featured white female characters, reinforcing narrow survival narratives that often sidelined BIPOC characters and audiences (Guerrero, 1993). Consequently, these films contributed to a white-centric definition of heroism, restricting the horror genre’s potential to explore diverse forms of strength and resilience (Benshoff, 1997). Characteristics of the Final Girl The Final Girl archetype is distinguished by intelligence, strength, and adaptability. However, the portrayal often fails to acknowledge how race and gender intersect to shape survival, resilience, and horror-specific trauma (Smith, 2016). Although she challenges traditional femininity by showcasing bravery and agency, the framing tends to disregard culturally specific experiences of survival, particularly within BIPOC communities (Crenshaw, 1991). These nuanced perspectives remain largely unexamined within mainstream horror films, where intersectional Final Girls are rare. Evolution of the Final Girl: Inclusive Horror Movie Tropes While the Final Girl has evolved to reflect more multidimensional characters, the representation of BIPOC women remains scarce. Films like Get Out  (2017) and Us  (2019), directed by Jordan Peele, offer critical subversions by centering BIPOC protagonists who reflect culturally specific struggles with systemic violence and exclusion (Peele, 2017; 2019). Peele’s horror films thereby create space for intersectional Final Girls, acknowledging how fear is shaped by lived experiences of racism, sexism, and social marginalization (Jackson, 2019). Critique and Subversion of Horror Movie Tropes Though it has empowered female representation, the Final Girl trope has limitations. Critics argue it can reinforce patriarchal structures by implying that women must display "masculine" traits to survive (Clover, 1992). Further, by often excluding the unique experiences of BIPOC characters, horror films can reinforce stereotypes and binary gender norms while erasing the lived dynamics of race and gender (Young, 2018). Limited representation suggests that the horror genre’s evolving portrayal of the Final Girl must broaden to include diverse backgrounds, fostering horror as a medium for intersectional storytelling (Dyer, 1997). The Future of Final Girls in Modern Horror Cinema As cinema shifts, the Final Girl’s representation is diversifying, recognizing the importance of intersectional and BIPOC storytelling. Centering BIPOC protagonists in survival narratives expands the Final Girl trope, making her a symbol of resilience across identities and experiences. An inclusive Final Girl narrative can empower broader audiences by reflecting authentic experiences and breaking stereotypes. This trend aligns with popular demand for diverse representation and more complex narratives in horror, offering audiences culturally resonant stories that challenge genre conventions (Gates, 2020). Conclusion The Final Girl trope has transformed from a symbol of female empowerment into a vehicle for exploring resilience and diversity within horror cinema. Although it has faced critique for limiting portrayals of race and gender, the trope’s evolution suggests a move towards inclusive and authentic storytelling. With the continued exploration of intersectionality in horror, the legacy of the Final Girl can adapt to resonate across communities, allowing horror to explore fear, identity, and empowerment in more expansive ways. References Benshoff, H. M. (1997). Monsters in the Closet: Homosexuality and the Horror Film . Manchester University Press. Clover, C. J. (1992). Men, Women, and Chain Saws: Gender in the Modern Horror Film . Princeton University Press. Coleman, R. (2011). Horror Noire: Blacks in American Horror Films from the 1890s to Present . Routledge. Crenshaw, K. (1991). "Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence Against Women of Color." Stanford Law Review , 43(6), 1241-1299. Dyer, R. (1997). White: Essays on Race and Culture . Routledge. Gates, P. (2020). The Horror Genre in American Cinema . Routledge. Guerrero, E. (1993). Framing Blackness: The African American Image in Film . Temple University Press. Jackson, A. (2019). "Horror’s Complex New Female Heroes." Journal of Popular Film and Television , 47(3), 173-183. Peele, J. (Director). (2017). Get Out  [Film]. Blumhouse Productions. Peele, J. (Director). (2019). Us  [Film]. Monkeypaw Productions. Smith, A. (2016). "Representation of Black Women in American Horror." Cultural Studies Review , 22(4), 24-38. Young, D. (2018). "The Intersectional Final Girl: A Critical Look at BIPOC Representation in Horror." Studies in Media and Communication , 6(3), 210-225. Check out some of our Final Girl merch!

  • Social Listening in Social Media Marketing: Balancing Business Growth with Social Responsibility for Small Businesses

    "Do not desire to fit in. Desire to oblige yourselves to lead.” - Gwendolyn Brooks In today's digital ecosystem, social media has emerged as a crucial tool for small businesses, providing direct access to consumers and offering a platform for branding, engagement, and marketing. One increasingly popular strategy for leveraging social media effectively is social listening . This process involves tracking and analyzing online conversations, keywords, and brand mentions to gather insights about customers, competitors, and industry trends. While social listening offers small businesses an invaluable means to grow and remain competitive, it also presents ethical challenges. Businesses must balance the pursuit of marketing insights with their social responsibility, particularly in matters of data privacy, consumer trust, and the promotion of social equity. Moreover, the influence of top social media platforms—Facebook, Instagram, and X (formerly Twitter)—plays a key role in shaping how businesses implement responsible practices, given their vast reach and capacity to amplify messages. These platforms are not just venues for promotion but are also essential for driving conversations around ethics, values, and responsible engagement with audiences. The Role of Social Listening in Small Business Marketing Social listening is a powerful method for monitoring customer sentiment and staying updated on relevant market trends. For small businesses, which may not have the same financial resources as large corporations for conducting in-depth market research, social listening serves as an affordable, real-time alternative. By tracking social media platforms such as Facebook, Instagram, and X, businesses can gather actionable data that helps them tailor their offerings to better meet customer needs. For instance, by tracking specific hashtags, keywords, or brand mentions, small businesses can monitor real-time feedback and uncover customer pain points (Grădinaru et al., 2021). If a local restaurant notices a surge in negative comments about the wait time through social listening, they can address the issue promptly, possibly by adjusting staffing levels or communicating more effectively with customers about delays. Likewise, monitoring industry-specific conversations can alert small businesses to emerging trends, allowing them to pivot their products or services to stay relevant in a fast-changing market. Additionally, social listening helps businesses identify potential crises before they escalate into larger problems. For example, a small clothing brand might detect rising customer dissatisfaction with a newly launched line through social media feedback. By catching this early, the brand can mitigate damage by responding to concerns and making necessary changes before negative sentiment becomes widespread (Swani et al., 2020). Thus, social listening not only supports marketing strategy but also aids in crisis management, customer relationship building, and product development. Ethical Considerations in Social Listening: Data Privacy and Transparency Despite the obvious benefits, social listening also raises important ethical considerations, particularly concerning the collection and use of customer data. Users may engage in public conversations on social media without fully realizing that their data is being tracked and analyzed by businesses for commercial gain. This leads to potential concerns about privacy invasion, data misuse, and a lack of transparency around how customer information is collected and utilized (Degli Esposti, 2020). For small businesses, which are often embedded in local communities and rely on personal connections with customers, maintaining trust is paramount. Transparency is key in ensuring that customers feel comfortable with how their data is used. Small businesses can implement ethical social listening practices by: Disclosing Data Collection Practices : Informing customers about the data being collected, how it will be used, and the benefits it will bring to the customer experience. By being upfront about their practices, businesses can foster trust and avoid accusations of data exploitation. Complying with Privacy Regulations : Ensuring that social listening activities adhere to data protection laws such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in Europe or the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) in the U.S. These regulations mandate that businesses collect, store, and use customer data responsibly, giving individuals more control over their personal information (Regan et al., 2021). Opting for Anonymized Data : In many cases, it is unnecessary to collect personal data to glean useful insights from social listening. By focusing on anonymized data, small businesses can still gain valuable information while protecting customer privacy. Ethical concerns around data usage not only impact consumer trust but also influence broader societal attitudes toward corporate responsibility. Small businesses that handle data transparently and ethically are more likely to build long-lasting relationships with customers and be perceived as trustworthy and responsible entities. The Role of Leading Social Media Platforms in Promoting Responsible Engagement While social listening enables businesses to tap into critical insights, the platforms themselves—Facebook, Instagram, and X—play a significant role in shaping responsible practices, especially considering their massive reach and the impact they have on public discourse. These platforms are critical for amplifying not only marketing messages but also social values and ethical responsibilities. Facebook : As the largest social media platform with nearly 3 billion active users, Facebook allows businesses to reach a vast audience, but it also presents unique responsibilities. Facebook’s highly personalized advertising features based on user data give small businesses the ability to target their marketing campaigns effectively. However, this level of personalization can raise concerns about data privacy and ethical advertising practices. Responsible businesses must ensure that their use of Facebook’s targeting tools is transparent and aligned with customer expectations regarding data usage. Additionally, Facebook offers the opportunity for businesses to engage in larger social conversations, such as sustainability or community support, enabling them to highlight their social responsibility initiatives (Saura et al., 2021). Instagram : With over 2 billion monthly active users and a heavy focus on visual content, Instagram is a key platform for small businesses, particularly those in industries like fashion, food, and lifestyle. The platform’s reach is particularly potent among younger demographics who are more attuned to ethical consumption and social justice issues. Instagram’s visual-first format makes it ideal for businesses to showcase their ethical and social responsibility efforts, whether it’s through posts, stories, or live videos. Instagram’s features, such as hashtag campaigns and polls, can also be used for real-time social listening, allowing businesses to gauge public sentiment and align their marketing strategies with trending social issues (Casaló et al., 2020). Businesses can use this platform not only to promote their products but also to actively participate in conversations about sustainability, inclusion, and community engagement. X (formerly Twitter) : X remains a major player in public discourse, particularly for sharing news, opinions, and engaging in real-time conversations. With its fast-paced nature, X is an ideal platform for tracking immediate customer feedback and engaging directly with customers, critics, and advocates. Small businesses can leverage X to engage in discussions on pressing social issues such as environmental responsibility or racial equality, directly responding to customer concerns and feedback in a public forum (Clark et al., 2021). However, given the public nature of X conversations, businesses must exercise caution when engaging with controversial topics. The platform’s openness offers a chance to display transparency and authenticity, which is increasingly valued by consumers. Responsible engagement on X can position a small business as both a responsive and ethically aware entity, participating in broader conversations about societal issues that impact its customers. Balancing Social Listening with Social Responsibility Beyond the ethical management of customer data, small businesses must also balance their social listening efforts with a broader commitment to social responsibility. Social media platforms are increasingly places where users expect businesses to engage with important social issues such as climate change, racial equity, and community well-being. Consumers, particularly younger demographics, are increasingly drawn to brands that demonstrate a commitment to making a positive societal impact (Vredenburg et al., 2020). As small businesses use social listening to monitor brand-related conversations, they should also pay attention to the social issues that matter to their audience. For example, a local fashion brand could use social listening not only to track trends in clothing styles but also to understand how sustainability conversations are evolving in their industry. This insight could guide the brand toward adopting more sustainable practices, such as using eco-friendly materials or reducing packaging waste, thus aligning their business operations with customer values. In some cases, social listening may reveal customer concerns about broader social justice issues. For instance, a small café might notice increased online discussions about the need for more inclusive spaces in their community. By listening to these conversations, the business could take action, perhaps by hosting community events or making its premises more accessible to people with disabilities. This engagement helps the business maintain a positive image while contributing to meaningful change in its community. Conclusion Social listening is an indispensable tool for small businesses looking to strengthen their marketing efforts, respond to customer needs in real-time, and stay competitive in a rapidly changing marketplace. However, to fully harness the power of social listening, small businesses must also address the ethical implications of data privacy and ensure that their marketing practices are socially responsible. By maintaining transparency in their data usage and engaging thoughtfully with social issues, small businesses can build stronger, more trust-based relationships with customers, all while contributing to a more ethical and inclusive business environment. Leading social media platforms like Facebook, Instagram, and X offer small businesses powerful tools for both marketing reach and responsible social engagement, creating a balance between business growth and ethical responsibility. References Casaló, L. V., Flavián, C., & Ibáñez-Sánchez, S. (2020). Influencers on Instagram: Antecedents and consequences of opinion leadership. Journal of Business Research , 117, 510-519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.07.005 Clark, M., Black, H. G., & Judson, K. (2021). Brand Activism on Social Media: Tweeting as a Strategy for Product Recall Crisis Communication. Journal of Marketing Communications , 27(1), 55-69. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527266.2019.1709216 Degli Esposti, S. (2020). Ethics of Big Data: Balancing Economic Benefits and Ethical Concerns. Journal of Business Ethics , Grădinaru, C., Ionescu, C., & Rusu, D. (2021). Social Media Listening for Marketing Insights. Marketing Insights Journal , 14(2), 83-94. Regan, P. M., Kelleher, D., & Moss, G. (2021). Data Privacy in the Age of Social Media: Issues and Challenges. Information Systems Research , 32(3), 789-805. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2021.0999 Saura, J. R., Palacios-Marqués, D., & Iturricha-Fernández, A. (2021). Ethical design in social media: Assessing the main performance measurements of user online behavior modification.  Journal of Business Research ,  129 , 271-281. Swani, K., Brown, B. P., & Milne, G. R. (2020). Should Small Firms Focus More on Social Media Marketing to Survive in the Post-COVID-19 Era? Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice , 28(4), 485-498. https://doi.org/10.1080/10696679.2020.1834851 Vredenburg, J., Kapitan, S., Spry, A., & Kemper, J. A. (2020). Brands Taking a Stand: Authentic Brand Activism or Woke Washing? Journal of Public Policy & Marketing , 39(4), 444-460. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743915620947359

  • Embracing LGBTQIA+ Diversity, Visibility, and Community: Why We Celebrate Pride

    We have to do it because we can no longer stay invisible. We have to be visible. We should not be ashamed of who we are. — Sylvia Rivera LGBTQIA+ Pride celebrations have evolved from small protests to vibrant, global events. Pride celebrations serve as a beacon of hope, solidarity, and progress for the LGBTQIA+ community and its allies. Beyond the rainbow flags and colorful parades, Pride offers a crucial platform for promoting visibility, understanding, and acceptance of diverse identities and experiences. In this blog, we'll explore the salience of LGBTQIA+ Pride in creating visibility, offering learning opportunities, and strengthening the fabric of our communities. Visibility and Representation: One of the most fundamental aspects of LGBTQIA+ Pride is its role in increasing visibility and representation for marginalized identities. Historically, LGBTQIA+ individuals have faced erasure and discrimination, relegated to the shadows of society. Pride events allow individuals to showcase their identities and challenge stereotypes. Visibility is not just about being seen; it's about being recognized and affirmed. Research has shown that representation in media and public spaces positively impacts the mental health and well-being of LGBTQIA+ individuals. Seeing oneself represented positively in society validates one's existence and cultivates a sense of belonging. Pride parades, festivals, and other events create spaces where LGBTQIA+ people can authentically express themselves without fear of judgment or persecution. Education and Awareness: Beyond its role in visibility, LGBTQIA+ Pride also serves as a vital educational platform. For many people, Pride events offer a first-hand opportunity to learn about the diverse spectrum of sexual orientations, gender identities, and expressions within the community. Workshops, panels, and discussions during Pride educate attendees about LGBTQIA+ history, struggles, and achievements. Moreover, Pride events encourage dialogue and empathy, bridging the gap between LGBTQIA+ individuals and the broader community. Fostering understanding and empathy promotes inclusivity and combats prejudice and discrimination. Allies, in particular, have opportunities to listen, learn, and show support for the LGBTQIA+ community. Building Community and Solidarity: At its core, Pride is about community and solidarity. It's a time for LGBTQIA+ individuals and their allies to commune, celebrate diversity, and affirm their shared humanity. Pride events provide spaces where people can connect with others who share similar experiences and identities, nurturing a sense of belonging and support. For many LGBTQIA+ individuals, Pride represents a moment of empowerment and affirmation. It's a chance to celebrate progress while acknowledging the ongoing fight for equality and justice. Pride events often highlight the intersectionality of LGBTQIA+ identities, recognizing that experiences of discrimination are compounded by factors such as race, class, and ability. By centering diverse voices and experiences, Pride reinforces the principle that liberation must be intersectional. Conclusion: LGBTQIA+ Pride is far more than just a celebration; it's a testament to resilience, visibility, and community. Creating spaces for visibility, education, and solidarity plays a crucial role in challenging stigma, encouraging understanding, and promoting equality. As we celebrate Pride, let us re-commit ourselves to building a world where all LGBTQIA+ individuals can live authentically, proudly, and without fear. References Herek, G. M. (2009). Hate crimes and stigma-related experiences among sexual minority adults in the United States: prevalence estimates from a national probability sample. Journal of interpersonal violence, 24(1), 54-74. Puckett, J. A., Woodward, E. N., Mereish, E. H., & Pantalone, D. W. (2015). Parental rejection following sexual orientation disclosure: Impact on internalized homophobia, social support, and mental health. LGBT health, 2(3), 265-269. Russell, S. T., & Fish, J. N. (2016). Mental health in lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) youth. Annual review of clinical psychology, 12, 465-487. Mohr, J. J., & Fassinger, R. E. (2000). Measuring dimensions of lesbian and gay male experience. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 33(2), 66-90.

  • Say Their Name: Nex Benedict and the Proliferation of Anti-Trans Legislation and Violence

    The more I hold myself close and fully embrace who I am, the more I thrive. — Elliot Page In recent years, the transgender community has faced escalating threats to their safety and well-being, particularly with the introduction of anti-trans legislation. This surge in discriminatory laws not only fosters a hostile environment but also serves as a catalyst for the proliferation of violence against transgender individuals. The tragic death of Nex Benedict highlights the urgency of addressing anti-trans legislation. Nex Benedict's story is a stark reminder of the harsh realities faced by transgender individuals on a daily basis. Tragically, their life was cut short, falling victim to the violent propaganda that conservative politicians have been peddling . The correlation between anti-trans legislation and violence against transgender individuals cannot be overlooked. When lawmakers pass bills that seek to restrict transgender people's access to healthcare, bathrooms, or legal recognition of their gender identity, it sends a dangerous message that their lives are expendable and their identities unworthy of respect. Such legislation legitimizes discrimination and emboldens individuals harboring transphobic sentiments to act upon their prejudice with impunity. Moreover, the dehumanizing rhetoric often employed by proponents of anti-trans legislation further fuels the flames of hatred and intolerance. By portraying transgender individuals as threats to public safety or as aberrations that must be eradicated, these individuals perpetuate harmful stereotypes and justify violence against an already vulnerable community. It is crucial to recognize that the violence faced by transgender individuals is not isolated to individual attacks but rather a systemic issue deeply rooted in societal transphobia. According to data from the Human Rights Campaign, transgender individuals, particularly transgender women of color, are disproportionately targeted for violence, including assault, harassment, and murder. This alarming trend underscores the urgent need for comprehensive legislative protections and societal change to ensure the safety and dignity of all transgender people. With the more than 400 hundred pieces of anti-trans legislation introduced, addressing the proliferation of anti-trans violence requires a multifaceted approach that encompasses legal reform, education, and community support. Lawmakers must prioritize the passage of inclusive policies that protect the rights of transgender individuals and hold perpetrators of violence accountable for their actions. Additionally, efforts to raise awareness about the challenges faced by the transgender community and combat misinformation and stigma are essential in fostering a culture of acceptance and respect. In memory of Nex Benedict and countless other transgender individuals who have lost their lives to senseless violence. We must increase our efforts to create a world where everyone can live authentically and without fear of persecution. Only through collective action and unwavering solidarity can we hope to bring about meaningful change and ensure a brighter, more inclusive future for all. References Trans legislation tracker. (2024). 2024 Anti-Trans Bills. https://translegislation.com/ HRC Foundation. (2022). Fatal Violence Against the Transgender and Gender-Expansive Community in 2022. https://www.hrc.org/resources/fatal-violence-against-the-transgender-and-gender-expansive-community-in-2022

bottom of page